Hulu Grows to 40% of the Premium Online Video Market

Hulu kicked off the Digital Content NewFronts (DCNF) yesterday with its presentation in New York. Among the highlights:

Key insights:
Hulu has more than 360 content partners between Hulu and Hulu Plus, and offers current season programming from five of the six major U.S. broadcast networks.

As of March 2012, Hulu has approximately 40,000 hours of content.

In February 2012, Americans watched 2.5 billion videos on Hulu.

Hulu represents 20% of the overall online video marketplace, and 40% of the online premium video marketplace.

Has served over 1,000 brand advertisers in its history.

TV Advertising is not just for TV Anymore

Earlier this month NBCUniversal held a social TV symposium in New York City at Studio 8H, (Saturday Night Live’s studio!) TV ad sales execs gathered to hear presentations chock-full of great information about social TV and advertising in today’s world.

This keynote video, given by Hill Holliday’s Mike Proulx (SVP, Director of Digital Strategy) and Stacey Shepatin (SVP, Director of National Broadcast). is a great overview of the social TV landscape.

 

 

Online Advertising Reaches New High in 2011

According to the new IAB Internet Advertising Revenue Report online ad revenues reached a record high of $31 billion in 2011, a 22% increase over 2010, which had also broken records with $26 billion in revenue. Highlights of the report include:

Mobile was the top category in terms of fastest growth, up 149% to $1.6 billion in 2011.

Digital video witnessed a 29% increase year-over-year, generating $1.8 billion in revenue last year.

Search remained top dog: 2011 revenues totaled $14.8 billion (+27%).

Display-related ad revenues in 2011 stood at $11.1 billion (+15%), carving out a 35% slice of total internet ad revenues.

Bluefin Labs New Tool Tracks Social Engagement of Advertising

Bluefin Labs, the social TV analytics company, has announced the launch of “Signals Brand Edition,” a new platform that measures and analyzes the social media performance of TV ad campaigns. Since the birth of television advertising, there has never been an automated system that tracks all commercials – where they are running and how people are responding in social media. Bluefin Labs will launch the service with several  clients including PepsiCo, Kraft Foods, Mars, Humana and Quicken Loans, together with agency partners Starcom MediaVest Group, Hill Holliday, Horizon Media, Initiative, MediaCom, Optimedia and Zenith Media.

Signals Brand Edition gives brands, agencies and media networks the ability to track commercials that run across U.S. national television, see a clear picture of when and where they air, and gain insight into how a TV campaign moves consumer conversation in social media. Via an online dashboard, brands can measure the impact of TV ads on brand conversation and discover the volume of social media users exposed to their TV ads. Signals Brand Edition also analyzes brand and lifestyle affinities of TV audiences, so brands can better target their TV campaign toward consumers who are most likely to respond and engage.

“For the first time, brands can see how their TV advertising drives conversations on Twitter and Facebook,” said Deb Roy, co-founder, chairman, and CEO, Bluefin Labs. “Signals Brand Edition opens the door to fully integrated cross-channel marketing across offline TV and online social media.”

Bluefin’s existing product, Signals Network Edition, is primarily social TV data about TV shows. There’s also an element of brand affinity and audience lifestyle affinity built into Signals Network Edition. In Signals Brand Edition, Bluefin has introduced an entirely new technology, which involves detection and recognition of commercials that air on TV. We use the knowledge of commercial airings, combined with social media commentary, to analyze how TV commercial campaigns move the consumer conversation in social, said Tom Thai.

With Signals Brand Edition, brands and their agencies will be able to make better-informed TV media investment and creative decisions. By combining the predictive intelligence of Bluefin’s data with customized audience segments, brands and agencies can more efficiently match TV shows, networks, programming genres and day-parts with TV ads and integrations. All data will be available to clients on an overnight basis, so that brands can immediately monitor and reconcile the placement of their ads and gain insights into their competitors’ TV media strategies.

Bluefin Labs is a social TV analytics company providing solutions to brand advertisers, advertising agencies, and TV networks. Bluefin Labs’ technology and data enable clients, for the first time, to tap into data at scale that links people’s social media commentary to the shows and commercials they watch on TV. Grounded in 15 years of cognitive science and machine learning research at the MIT Media Lab, Bluefin Labs is headquartered in Cambridge, MA. For more about Bluefin Labs, visit www.bluefinlabs.com.

Hulu – The Little Site that Became a Big Network

Five years ago, some of the most powerful players in television banded together to introduce Hulu, a streaming service intended to revolutionize the TV industry.

This week, Hulu will look more like a traditional network than an Internet pioneer.

At a presentation on Thursday in New York, Hulu, created as a service for watching network television online, will pitch advertisers on original programming in an annual ritual known as upfronts that are typically reserved for cable channels and network broadcasters.

Hulu executives are expected to take the stage to sell advertisers on new series. The executives will also promote the service’s desirable demographic of young viewers who turn to Hulu for popular network sitcoms like “New Girl” and “Family Guy,” available only after they are broadcast on Fox.

As an online television destination, Hulu is something of a teenager now, sometimes tolerating feuding parents and succeeding perhaps in spite of them. Hulu is growing steadily, despite disagreements among its corporate owners, and the new restrictions those owners have placed on free streaming of network shows.

This week Hulu will announce that it has topped two million subscribers for its $8-a-month Hulu Plus service in the first quarter, half a million more than it had at the end of 2011. But it has not been an easy path to growth.

The executives who were the greatest champions of Hulu at its inception — Jeff Zucker, the former chief executive of NBCUniversal, and Peter Chernin, formerly the chief operating officer at News Corporation — have moved on. Their successors are less enamored with the service, which they view as a potential threat to traditional revenue streams. Hulu’s owners are the Walt Disney Company, the News Corporation’s Fox Broadcasting unit, Comcast’s NBCUniversal unit and Providence Equity Partners. In 2007, when Internet television viewing began to take off in earnest, Hulu’s corporate parents raced to create a legal TV-streaming service supported by advertising. But more recently, those corporate parents have struck multibillion-dollar streaming deals with cable and satellite operators to make shows available online to their subscribers with tablets or smartphones.

Even though its audience was growing — and continues to grow — Hulu’s corporate parents questioned whether giving their shows away online could put at risk the hundreds of millions they earn from traditional cable and satellite deals. Hulu has embraced its new reality, and has maintained growth while doing so. With roughly 38 million visitors a month, according to the measurement firm comScore, the service had revenue of $420 million in 2011, up 60 percent from $263 million in 2010.

Attesting to the shift toward subscriptions, the company expects revenue from Hulu Plus to account for more than half of its total in 2012.

“The bulk of our business is working with those big media companies, and they’re going to make choices based on how they see the whole ecosystem evolving,” said Andy Forssell, Hulu’s senior vice president of content.

But Hulu still has to figure out how to marry its own subscription service with the systems that are being set up by the cable and satellite operators.

A few years ago, Hulu had a motivational effect on the media industry. It is widely credited with accelerating a trend toward on-demand television that forced networks and studios to figure out what to stream online, and what not to stream.

Some shows, like “Community” on NBC and “Fringe” on Fox, have benefited markedly from online streaming. “If we’re really on our game, people will look back on it and will say, ‘Wow, I can’t believe TV was like that in 2007,’ ” Jason Kilar, Hulu’s chief executive, said at a recent advertising industry conference. He declined interview requests for this article.

Multiscreen Viewing Driven by Consumer Interest

While traditional ‘lean-back’ TV may be strong among U.S. viewers, a growing number of consumers have interest in — or have already adopted — multiscreen smaller device habits.
A new 2012 survey found that 57% of people are interested in multiscreen video services, up from 48% in 2011. The study comes from Toronto-based QuickPlay Media, a provider of video to IP-connected devices.

Another 35% have reported trying a mobile TV and/or video service, with 27% saying they currently use new video services. 43% of current users consume mobile TV and video at least once per week; and 23% have daily usage.

Much of this activity is relatively new: 72% have been mobile TV and video users for a year or less, and 81% say they watch more video on multiscreen devices than a year ago.

But not all advertising messaging is making an impact. Only 20% recall viewing ads on their device while using a mobile TV and/or video service, and 81% say there is a lack of advertising variety.

Good news for social media services: 74% are interested in viewing mobile TV and/or video channels that integrate sites such as Facebook or Twitter.

The big preference for specific programming is for TV episodes — which tallied a 38% score. Sports was next at 28%, followed by news at 19%. Live programming scored well — preferred by 51% of users — with a 30% score for sports, 21% for TV episodes, and 34% preferring an on-demand format.

Second Screen Viewing Apps Hijacking Network Programming

Social TV is proving to be an interesting conundrum for networks that pay large fees to get broadcast rights to major sporting events, according to Adweek. This is primarily due to the availability of companion-viewing apps from companies such as ESPN, Yahoo! and more.

The report indicates this can be troublesome for networks such as NBC, the owner of exclusive rights to the Olympics, when the likes of ESPN launch mobile apps that viewers can have on hand while watching a live game. “We want to see ESPN as a second screen for all sports,” said Eric Johnson, EVP/Multimedia Sales at ESPN to Adweek. “We want to take co-viewing to the next level.”

WWE Pushes the Social TV Envelope at WrestleMania

WrestleMania has transformed itself from a small wrestling event to an international media spectacle. In its 28th incarnation, held at the beginning of this month, there were no signs of it stopping.

World Wrestling Entertainment did something unique last year – it announced the main event for WrestleMania over a year in advance. The big match featured Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson, a huge cross-over star, and John Cena, the current flag bearer for the company. Recognizing the challenges of trying to keep interest for the match a year in advance, the WWE turned to social media.

So far, their engagement strategy appears to be working. The WWE feels like they are more up-to-date and engaged. In many cases, WWE wrestlers were actively retweeted, followed and engaged by fans. One stat that is very telling was the number of followers and likes they have on Facebook and Twitter.

The numbers behind this are impressive. Between all of the stars’ accounts, they have over 60 million Twitter followers and 20 million Facebook likes. In 2011, they received over 1 billion views on their YouTube channel (those are Justin Bieber-like numbers, folks). Aside from social statistics, the actual event WrestleMania broke both attendance and gate records at the Sun Life Stadium with over 78,000 fans. However, the real telling statistic will be Pay-Per-View buy-rates and how many the WWE is able to generate. Like all live PPV events, the WWE fights piracy from multiple live streaming sites online. The expectations and pressure are high, especially bringing back The Rock in such a marquee match to help raise buy-rates.

This year at WrestleMania, over 110 individual terms trended during the event. The #Wrestlemania hashtag was mentioned over 600,000 times delivering nearly a billion potential impressions with a reach of over 130 million people.

Increasing Streaming Video Options Drive Consumer Confusion

Competing online video services have become so successful that about one-third of Americans have streamed a movie or TV show on Netflix, Hulu, Vudu, Crackle or another Net-based video service, according to Nielsen.

Americans will watch 3.4 billion movies online this year, more than doubling 2011’s total and exceeding DVD and Blu-ray consumption for the first time, estimates researcher IHS Screen Digest.

“We are looking at the beginning of the end of the age of movies” on discs, says IHS senior principal analyst Dan Cryan.

Another sign of streaming’s success is that entrenched pay-TV providers, such as Comcast, are creating their own similar services in an effort to keep subscribers.

That has resulted in a battle royal as traditional and upstart video services alike attempt to trump each other in hopes of swiping and keeping customers. With hardware makers and even large retailers such as Walmart also drooling for a piece of the programming pie, “It is confusing the hell out of people,” says Phil Swann, editor of TVPredictions.com.

Like it or not, TV lovers such as Larry R. Haynes are caught in a tug of war over the future of television. Haynes and his wife, Jennifer, subscribe to Comcast for Internet and TV, but they have trimmed their bill by canceling Showtime, while keeping HBO. And like many others, they have turned to Netflix for additional viewing options.

Streaming services “just do not have the selection like the cable companies do yet,” says the 32-year-old Grand Rapids, Mich., engineer. “So I am not about to cancel my cable service … like I hear a lot of people are doing.”

He has also experimented with Comcast’s smartphone app, which lets him watch streamed TV shows and movies. “It’s about time they started trying to retain their current customers,” he says.

That is music to the ears of cable companies as well as satellite services DirecTV and Dish Network and fiber-based networks Verizon FiOS and AT&T U-verse.

During the height of the economic downturn (2008-2011), more than 2.65 million subscribers — mostly cable subscribers — dropped their pay-TV service entirely in favor of streaming video options, according to The Convergence Consulting Group.

But satellite and broadband companies actually saw increases in subscribers.

And now that cable companies are fighting back with their own free and paid on-demand options, the rate at which subscribers are dropping cable may be starting to slow.

Get ready to be confused

Consumers increasingly will find themselves wading through multiple device options and payment plans for streaming services. “It’s going to be a bit complicated for a while,” says Maryann Baldwin of Magid Media Futures.

Netflix has been the key catalyst in the surge of streaming. The movie-rental superpower has grown its streaming service into a programming channel used by nearly 22 million of its 24.4 million subscribers.

Along with Hulu, Vudu and Crackle, Amazon’s Prime — which began as a two-day shipping service — has also become a formidable Netflix competitor. Prime costs $79 a year to join and allows free streaming of about 17,000 video titles, says Bill Carr, Amazon’s vice president of videos and music.

The all-you-can-stream subscription model helped win skeptical customers. The number of people who subscribe to an online streaming service grew 74% in 2011, IHS says.

“If you buy a movie, you sit through it even if it’s rubbish,” Cryan says. “With streaming, people just start a new” movie.

Even some content providers, such as HBO and a consortium of movie studios — via the cloud-based UltraViolet locker system — are developing their own delivery software.

Competition has been a boon for customers looking for the cheapest way to watch new films, such as Moneyball, or more obscure and high-definition choices.

“Now anybody with good content can reach an audience,” says Colin Dixon, analyst at The Diffusion Group. ”

So it’s not surprising that much of the marketing fight is about who has the best content, now that studios have made licensing easier. “But with so many streaming companies eager to get their hands on content, the licenses for new and popular titles are becoming more expensive for all,” Cryan says.

Netflix is hoping to stand out with originally produced shows. Last month, the service launched Lilyhammer, a series featuring E Street Band member Steven Van Zandt. Also in the works is House of Cards, starring Kevin Spacey. Netflix will also revive the Fox TV series Arrested Development next year.

“Eighteen months ago, Netflix said its strength is its breadth of library. (Others) now also have a lot of titles,” says Dan Rayburn, an analyst at StreamingMedia.com. “Netflix changed their tune to say it’s about exclusive content.” But he’s not sold on Netflix’s original content plans, noting the high rate of churn among its subscribers. “Producing something like Mad Men can cost $100 million.”

YouTube, which Nielsen says accounted for 45% of Americans’ online video streaming time in the fourth quarter of 2011, has its own TV channels, too.

Pay-TV strategies

With the battle for consumers’ eyeballs expanding to tablets and smartphones, pay-TV providers are making a stand.

TV watchers generally prefer to watch movies and TV shows from one interface, says Gerry Kaufhold, research director of digital entertainment at DisplaySearch/In-Stat. “The pay-TV services are all scrambling to come up with ways to put apps on tablets and smartphones so that they can provide that.”

•Comcast. Its Xfinity Streampix service gives its video subscribers on-demand viewing of movies and TV shows on iPhones and iPads.

Customers streamed about 375 million times per month at the beginning of the year — up from 325 million a year ago — across all categories. “There is a huge amount of engagement,” says Marcien Jenckes, Comcast Cable’s senior vice president of video services.

•Cox Communications. Last May, it introduced Cox TV Online, which gives customers access to 10,000 videos for computers and laptops. It’s already attracting 1 million views per month, says Steve Necessary, vice president of video strategy.

Cox also rolled out Cox TV Connect, an iPad app for more recent shows that can only be surfed at home by its customers. Released in December, the app is used by about 20% of Cox customers who own an iPad on a monthly basis.

•Dish Network. It upgraded its Blockbuster Movie Pass ($10 per month in addition to a Dish subscription) by adding instant streaming of more than 100,000 movies, TV shows and games to TV and iPad.

•Verizon. The telecom giant is creating a streaming service with Redbox, the DVD and Blu-ray disc rental kiosk company.

Pay-TV companies will fight to keep their customers within their product systems, and the perception that hordes of customers will cut the cord and flock to online streaming options is still premature, says Wedbush Securities analyst Michael Pachter.

Traditional TV providers remain the favorites of Hollywood and content owners, he says, because “they all lose if everything moves à la carte via the Internet.” Content owners and studios stand to make more from cable and satellite companies that already package channels and could easily add streaming features than from a model where subscribers paid for only the channels they wanted, he says.

To that end, Netflix CEO Reed Hastings has said that he is discussing with cable operators the bundling of its streaming service into pay-TV packages. “They would have to share some of the revenue with the cable operator, but that would make Netflix’s content instantly available for a cable subscriber,” Kaufhold says. “There’s no reason why that can’t happen.”

That type of the mash-up of traditional pay-TV offerings with Net app-based content, or hybrid TV service, will be in about 10 million U.S. homes by the end of 2012 and 35 million by 2016, In-Stat estimates. “The cable operators and the other pay-TV services are all moving in that direction,” Kaufhold says.

In the interim, all the streaming services are cozying up to video game hardware makers. Last week, Sony’s PlayStation 3 became the first video game console to provide access to Amazon.com’s Instant Video service, which has more than 120,000 movies and TV programs that you can buy or rent.

And Microsoft’s Xbox 360 has added apps to make it easier for Verizon, Comcast and HBO subscribers to view content through Xbox Live. “They see a great opportunity to use our platform to better serve their customers,” says Ross Honey, general manager of Xbox Live entertainment and advertising.

There also are so many dedicated streaming devices, such as Roku, Boxee and WD TV (by Western Digital), that some may not survive. “A couple of these guys are going to have a hard time standing alone,” Rayburn says. With a dizzying set of options that are constantly evolving, consumers will likely flock to the providers that keep things simple to use, he says.

“If you know what you’re doing, there are plenty of options. The problem is most consumers don’t,” he says. “There will be more fragmentation in two years. It’s a nightmare.”

from USA Today

CBS and NBC see Rise in SocialTV Engagement

Trendrr.TV’s March Report finds that there were over 150 million conversations and other social interactions through the first quarter of 2012. Additionally, three quarters of all Social TV engagement in March stemmed from Twitter, with The Voice’s “The Battle Begins” episode (broadcast) and the Pretty Little Liars season finale (cable) bringing in the highest volume of TV engagement on the micro-blogging site.

Looking at broadcast and cable television in terms of social activity, the report reveals that there were 580K social interactions per day on broadcast TV, and an average of over 860K social interactions per day on cable TV. Other data from Trendrr includes:

CBS and NBC had the highest increase in broadcast social share, up 5% from February.

MTV was the top social cable network with a 10% cable social share.

truTV, which benefitted from the NCAA Tournament, came in second with 9%.
Over the course of the NCAA Tournament, CBS games were the most socially active of any other network.