Increasing Streaming Video Options Drive Consumer Confusion

Competing online video services have become so successful that about one-third of Americans have streamed a movie or TV show on Netflix, Hulu, Vudu, Crackle or another Net-based video service, according to Nielsen.

Americans will watch 3.4 billion movies online this year, more than doubling 2011’s total and exceeding DVD and Blu-ray consumption for the first time, estimates researcher IHS Screen Digest.

“We are looking at the beginning of the end of the age of movies” on discs, says IHS senior principal analyst Dan Cryan.

Another sign of streaming’s success is that entrenched pay-TV providers, such as Comcast, are creating their own similar services in an effort to keep subscribers.

That has resulted in a battle royal as traditional and upstart video services alike attempt to trump each other in hopes of swiping and keeping customers. With hardware makers and even large retailers such as Walmart also drooling for a piece of the programming pie, “It is confusing the hell out of people,” says Phil Swann, editor of TVPredictions.com.

Like it or not, TV lovers such as Larry R. Haynes are caught in a tug of war over the future of television. Haynes and his wife, Jennifer, subscribe to Comcast for Internet and TV, but they have trimmed their bill by canceling Showtime, while keeping HBO. And like many others, they have turned to Netflix for additional viewing options.

Streaming services “just do not have the selection like the cable companies do yet,” says the 32-year-old Grand Rapids, Mich., engineer. “So I am not about to cancel my cable service … like I hear a lot of people are doing.”

He has also experimented with Comcast’s smartphone app, which lets him watch streamed TV shows and movies. “It’s about time they started trying to retain their current customers,” he says.

That is music to the ears of cable companies as well as satellite services DirecTV and Dish Network and fiber-based networks Verizon FiOS and AT&T U-verse.

During the height of the economic downturn (2008-2011), more than 2.65 million subscribers — mostly cable subscribers — dropped their pay-TV service entirely in favor of streaming video options, according to The Convergence Consulting Group.

But satellite and broadband companies actually saw increases in subscribers.

And now that cable companies are fighting back with their own free and paid on-demand options, the rate at which subscribers are dropping cable may be starting to slow.

Get ready to be confused

Consumers increasingly will find themselves wading through multiple device options and payment plans for streaming services. “It’s going to be a bit complicated for a while,” says Maryann Baldwin of Magid Media Futures.

Netflix has been the key catalyst in the surge of streaming. The movie-rental superpower has grown its streaming service into a programming channel used by nearly 22 million of its 24.4 million subscribers.

Along with Hulu, Vudu and Crackle, Amazon’s Prime — which began as a two-day shipping service — has also become a formidable Netflix competitor. Prime costs $79 a year to join and allows free streaming of about 17,000 video titles, says Bill Carr, Amazon’s vice president of videos and music.

The all-you-can-stream subscription model helped win skeptical customers. The number of people who subscribe to an online streaming service grew 74% in 2011, IHS says.

“If you buy a movie, you sit through it even if it’s rubbish,” Cryan says. “With streaming, people just start a new” movie.

Even some content providers, such as HBO and a consortium of movie studios — via the cloud-based UltraViolet locker system — are developing their own delivery software.

Competition has been a boon for customers looking for the cheapest way to watch new films, such as Moneyball, or more obscure and high-definition choices.

“Now anybody with good content can reach an audience,” says Colin Dixon, analyst at The Diffusion Group. ”

So it’s not surprising that much of the marketing fight is about who has the best content, now that studios have made licensing easier. “But with so many streaming companies eager to get their hands on content, the licenses for new and popular titles are becoming more expensive for all,” Cryan says.

Netflix is hoping to stand out with originally produced shows. Last month, the service launched Lilyhammer, a series featuring E Street Band member Steven Van Zandt. Also in the works is House of Cards, starring Kevin Spacey. Netflix will also revive the Fox TV series Arrested Development next year.

“Eighteen months ago, Netflix said its strength is its breadth of library. (Others) now also have a lot of titles,” says Dan Rayburn, an analyst at StreamingMedia.com. “Netflix changed their tune to say it’s about exclusive content.” But he’s not sold on Netflix’s original content plans, noting the high rate of churn among its subscribers. “Producing something like Mad Men can cost $100 million.”

YouTube, which Nielsen says accounted for 45% of Americans’ online video streaming time in the fourth quarter of 2011, has its own TV channels, too.

Pay-TV strategies

With the battle for consumers’ eyeballs expanding to tablets and smartphones, pay-TV providers are making a stand.

TV watchers generally prefer to watch movies and TV shows from one interface, says Gerry Kaufhold, research director of digital entertainment at DisplaySearch/In-Stat. “The pay-TV services are all scrambling to come up with ways to put apps on tablets and smartphones so that they can provide that.”

•Comcast. Its Xfinity Streampix service gives its video subscribers on-demand viewing of movies and TV shows on iPhones and iPads.

Customers streamed about 375 million times per month at the beginning of the year — up from 325 million a year ago — across all categories. “There is a huge amount of engagement,” says Marcien Jenckes, Comcast Cable’s senior vice president of video services.

•Cox Communications. Last May, it introduced Cox TV Online, which gives customers access to 10,000 videos for computers and laptops. It’s already attracting 1 million views per month, says Steve Necessary, vice president of video strategy.

Cox also rolled out Cox TV Connect, an iPad app for more recent shows that can only be surfed at home by its customers. Released in December, the app is used by about 20% of Cox customers who own an iPad on a monthly basis.

•Dish Network. It upgraded its Blockbuster Movie Pass ($10 per month in addition to a Dish subscription) by adding instant streaming of more than 100,000 movies, TV shows and games to TV and iPad.

•Verizon. The telecom giant is creating a streaming service with Redbox, the DVD and Blu-ray disc rental kiosk company.

Pay-TV companies will fight to keep their customers within their product systems, and the perception that hordes of customers will cut the cord and flock to online streaming options is still premature, says Wedbush Securities analyst Michael Pachter.

Traditional TV providers remain the favorites of Hollywood and content owners, he says, because “they all lose if everything moves à la carte via the Internet.” Content owners and studios stand to make more from cable and satellite companies that already package channels and could easily add streaming features than from a model where subscribers paid for only the channels they wanted, he says.

To that end, Netflix CEO Reed Hastings has said that he is discussing with cable operators the bundling of its streaming service into pay-TV packages. “They would have to share some of the revenue with the cable operator, but that would make Netflix’s content instantly available for a cable subscriber,” Kaufhold says. “There’s no reason why that can’t happen.”

That type of the mash-up of traditional pay-TV offerings with Net app-based content, or hybrid TV service, will be in about 10 million U.S. homes by the end of 2012 and 35 million by 2016, In-Stat estimates. “The cable operators and the other pay-TV services are all moving in that direction,” Kaufhold says.

In the interim, all the streaming services are cozying up to video game hardware makers. Last week, Sony’s PlayStation 3 became the first video game console to provide access to Amazon.com’s Instant Video service, which has more than 120,000 movies and TV programs that you can buy or rent.

And Microsoft’s Xbox 360 has added apps to make it easier for Verizon, Comcast and HBO subscribers to view content through Xbox Live. “They see a great opportunity to use our platform to better serve their customers,” says Ross Honey, general manager of Xbox Live entertainment and advertising.

There also are so many dedicated streaming devices, such as Roku, Boxee and WD TV (by Western Digital), that some may not survive. “A couple of these guys are going to have a hard time standing alone,” Rayburn says. With a dizzying set of options that are constantly evolving, consumers will likely flock to the providers that keep things simple to use, he says.

“If you know what you’re doing, there are plenty of options. The problem is most consumers don’t,” he says. “There will be more fragmentation in two years. It’s a nightmare.”

from USA Today

Huffington Post Building Digital Video Based News Website

The Huffington Post co-founder Ken Lerer wants to build a digital video news website intended for those who watch Jon Stewart and like-minded programming (not CNN or Fox News), reports AllThingsD.

Although a name hasn’t been determined yet, the site will reportedly launch sometime this summer and will feature a combination of live-video content and taped reports, and a mix of professionally produced programming and amateur content.

This new digital video news operation will not be confined to its website, as it will look to tap the reach of social networks for distribution. AllThingsD says the site/service has started hiring production and back-end staff, but not potential on-air talent just yet.

Why New Broadband Players Can’t Dethrone Pay TV

The Internet, the greatest disruptive force in media of our time, has decimated the music and publishing industries but has left the pay TV business largely unscathed — so far.

Subscriber rolls of cable, satellite and telco TV providers have held steady despite the rapid growth of streaming-video services from the likes of Netflix and Amazon.com, plus a wealth of digital entertainment options from iTunes, Walmart and others.

In the fourth quarter of 2011, pay TV providers added a net 300,000 subscribers — and premium networks HBO, Showtime, Starz and Epix gained nearly 2.2 million in the period, according to research firm SNL Kagan.

At some point, if the walls come tumbling down and millions of consumers choose to get TV content through a broadband service instead of their traditional provider, the industry may face a reckoning. Connected video devices, including Apple’s new iPad with its dazzling ultra-HD display, are blooming by the millions and presenting an open field for new entrants.

Deep-pocketed challengers still see the multichannel video market, which generates tens of billions in yearly subscription revenue, as ripe for the picking.

Intel is mulling a “virtual MSO” service. Apple fans are hyperventilating in anticipation of an advanced HDTV the tech giant is said to be readying to launch this year, which could make it even easier to watch over-the-top video. Google is plugging away on its connected-TV strategy, in the belief that — eventually — the Internet will become a significant source of video viewing.

While cord-cutting is not a rampant problem today, the pay TV industry’s core multichannel bundle could reach a breaking point at which enough consumers find enough value in alternative services to ditch their high-priced cable or satellite bill, industry consultant Will Richmond, editor and publisher of VideoNuze, said.

“I would argue it’s an inch below the surface,” he said. “Look at DVDs. All it took was a couple of years of inexpensive rentals and BitTorrent for that to crater.”

But the economic realities of today’s television industry present a huge barrier standing in the way of that trend gathering strength.

Large media companies spend some $40 billion per year creating content, according to Todd Juenger, senior analyst with Sanford Bernstein. Programmers, including sports networks like ESPN and cable mainstays like Viacom and Discovery Communications, are unwilling to supply over-the-top distributors with their current programming because that would disrupt their existing businesses. But they have happily sold streaming rights to older seasons and catalog movie titles to Netflix and Amazon. “Everybody wants to tell me that Apple is going to disrupt the whole world as we know it,” Juenger said. “But it comes back to the content guys. They have all the stuff people want to see, and they’re under no obligation to make that available to anyone.”

Meanwhile, pay TV providers are responding on multiple trajectories. Operators have introduced lower-priced video tiers. Comcast and Verizon are two incumbents that have announced plans for Netflix-like collections of on-demand, multiscreen video: If you can’t beat ’em, join ’em.

On the most strategic front are TV Everywhere services, which are intended to provide anytime, anywhere access to current content on multiple devices — so customers don’t latch on to over-the-top services.

“The idea is to make it less compelling for a subscriber to even contemplate dropping pay TV,” Juenger said, while also allowing networks to justify rate hikes to the operators.

TV Everywhere has evolved in fits and starts, with some operators and programmers more fully embracing the concept than others. Part of the reason there isn’t more urgency: The cord-cutting threat has not hit a high pain threshold.

“It’s been three years since [Comcast CEO] Brian Roberts and [Time Warner Inc. CEO] Jeff Bewkes linked arms” in their seminal TV Everywhere pact, Richmond noted. “There’s some progress, but not a lot.”

In any case TV Everywhere doesn’t address a key underlying issue— that the cost of the overall multichannel bundle continues to climb. In Richmond’s view, over-the-top providers are bound to step in to fill the gap if the TV industry doesn’t offer new forms of content packaging.

“I think multichannel bundling is a complete anachronism,” he said.“A la carte is what the Internet has trained us to do.”

Viacom Delivers Multi-Screen Campaigns with Surround Sound

Viacom has unveiled Surround Sound, a new ad service that will enable advertisers to reach specific audiences across every screen that Viacom is on, whether it is television, or online video, premium display, mobile or other digital platforms. It will be available for all of Viacom’s media networks, including MTV, Nickelodeon, Comedy Central, Spike and VH1. Powered by Adobe’s AudienceManager platform, Surround Sound offers advertisers scalable media buys across nearly 100 million homes on-air, more than 80 million unique visitors online, as well as the mobile and email users Viacom reaches across the globe. Viacom says Surround Sound will leverage the company’s proprietary, anonymous first-party data, as well as anonymous data from industry partners and providers, around “demographics, behavior, geography and purchase propensities.”

Hulu Delivers Record High Number of Ad Impressions

The February 2012 comScore’s Video Metrix report shows that 179 million U.S. internet users watched nearly 38 billion online videos during the month.

As usual, Google, thanks to YouTube, ranked as the top online video content property with 147.4 million unique viewers. It was followed by Yahoo!, VEVO, Facebook and Viacom Digital. In terms of number of video views and average minutes per viewer, Google (16.7 billion/418.2 minutes) and Hulu (951 million/226.5 minutes) held down the top two spots in each category.

The report also finds that Americans viewed 7.5 billion video ads in February, with Hulu delivering a record-high number of video ad impressions at more than 1.5 billion. Google came in second with 1.1 billion video ads during the month. Adap.tv, BrightRoll Video Network and Specific Media rounded out the top five.

NPD Predicts Rapid Hybrid TV Growth

According to a new forecast from NPD In-Stat, 100 million households will actively use a “hybrid” service that combines the web and TV experiences delivered to their TV set by 2016. “The next step in the viewing experience will be for TV sets and set-top boxes to permit all of the traditional TV-related services, which is then expanded and enhanced by bringing in content from the internet, or from internet-like web services that provide a ‘walled garden’ of authorized content and on-screen features,” said Gerry Kaufhold, Research Director. Alongside web-based content coming to TV screens, Kaufhold said that NPD In-Stat expects nearly 80 million households to be actively using TV apps from a service provider by 2016. Among the findings:

Personal computers are still the primary display device for viewing videos from the web.

North America is the early leader for hybrid TV households, but the U.K., France and Germany are rapidly growing.

Intel: The New Cable TV

Intel is considering its own online pay-TV service for U.S. consumers.

According to a report from The Wall Street Journal, Intel has been pitching media companies on a plan to create a “virtual cable operator” that would offer U.S. TV channels nationwide over the Internet in a bundle similar to subscriptions sold by cable- and satellite-TV operators. Intel wouldn’t provide Internet access, which subscribers would obtain separately.

In its presentations to media companies, Intel says it is making its own set-top box to carry the TV service, and it has demonstrated an interface for users to browse programs.

Intel plans to launch a service by the end of 2012, though it faces hurdles such as scarce bandwidth and the high price of TV programming.

The new effort would mark a big shift for Intel Chief Executive Paul Otellini, who has made clear his determination to move the company beyond the computer industry. Those efforts so far have include a series of TV-related businesses that have largely failed to gain traction.

Intel’s maneuvers come as the broader television business undergoes a major shift, with people spending more time watching video on the Internet and mobile devices.

Several technology and electronics companies have considered offerings that would use the Internet to deliver bundles of live or on-demand TV channels. In recent months, Sony Corp. and Dish Network Corp. have held exploratory talks about creating such services. Others, including Google, Apple Inc. and Microsoft Corp.

A virtual cable service could theoretically offer smaller or cheaper bundles than traditional cable subscriptions. Intel, for instance, has talked about offering, say, 50 channels, rather than 150, according to one of the people familiar with the matter. But media companies are likely to resist such shifts, at least initially, because they make money by selling big bundles of channels via cable operators.

Internet bandwidth could be another problem. Some tech companies have retreated from plans to become virtual cable operators in part because of an inability to guarantee enough bandwidth for high-quality video at all times of day, one media executive said. Cable operators, which also sell high-speed Internet access, could shift to usage-based Internet pricing if more people start consuming their video online. If that happened, consumers watching a lot of online video could end up paying much more for Internet access—cutting into what a virtual cable operator could reasonably charge its subscribers for a package of channels.

A third issue could be many existing TV channels’ lack of Internet rights to all of their own shows. That would mean some channels on a service like the one Intel is proposing could be reduced, at least initially, to a selection of shows in an on-demand format, rather than live. That could make a Web offering less competitive.

TV Advertising Surges while Traditional Ad Spending Declines

Ad spending on network television surged last quarter while other traditional media and digital outlets were hit by year-end belt tightening, according to a study issued Monday, one of several this week that will dissect the health of the 2011 advertising market.

The figures may validate a cautious optimism by network execs so far this year even as the latest Q4 and full-year 2011 stats from ad tracking firm Kantar Media shows a fuzzy overall picture for total U.S. ad spending.

Network TV saw spending jump 7.7% in the last three months of the year. However, total U.S. ad spend dipped 1%, the first quarterly decline since the end of 2009. Overall growth has declined for five consecutive quarters since a post-recession peak in the third quarter of 2010 — notnot the kind of numbers showbizzers want to see as the summer upfront advertising selling season approaches.

Broadcast networks were helped by strong pricing for football, a World Series that went to seven games, and the launch of “The X Factor” on Fox, Kantar said.

Spanish language television was on fire — up 19% in the quarter and 8.3% for the year.

Cable growth slowed to 2.4% as higher demand from restaurants and retailers was offset by cuts in consumer packaged goods.

The figures were flipped for the full year when network TV fell 2% and cable rose 7.7%.

Spending on so-called mature digital media formats fell in the fourth quarter with paid search budgets down 6.4% year-on-year and display spending down 5.9%. It’s a move that “bears watching as 2012 unfolds,” said Jon Swallen, senior veep of research at Kantar North America. He questioned whether it was a one-off event or a sign of digital dollars moving toward emerging, unmeasured digital platforms.

Search was hit by lower financial, insurance and local service advertisers, and display was hampered by reduced coin from automakers, telecom providers and the travel biz. For the full year, paid search declined 2.8% and display rose 5.5%.

Syndication, benefitting from higher spending by department stores and health and beauty brands, saw spending soar 11% percent in the fourth quarter and 15.4% for the year.

Spending on local TV fell 8.7% in the fourth quarter despite easy comps in November and December against diminished post-election volume of a year ago. It was down 4.5% for the year.

Consumer magazines, flat year-on-year, took a hit in the fourth quarter, falling 5.2% on cuts in auto, food and pharmaceutical advertising.

Local newspaper ad spend fell about 3.9% for the quarter and the year.

Local radio was down 3.8% for the quarter. National spot radio plummeted 13.9% on reduced outlay from telecom, financial service and autos. Network radio spending was up 4.3% for the quarter and 2.7% for the year.

Procter & Gamble was the top advertiser for the ninth year running with spending of about $3 billion, down 5.4%. P&G’s 2011 budget saw share gains for magazines at the expense of TV, Kantar said.

AT&T, the second largest advertiser at $1.9 billion, spent nearly 12% less after an aborted takeover of T-Mobile.

Verizon Communications was also down about 12% for the year at $1.6 billion, although spending was up in the fourth quarter.

Of the top 10 advertisers, Chrysler’s spending rose 36% to $1.2 billion.

In contrast, General Motors spent 16% less for the year and 25% less for the quarter.

Among media advertisers, Comcast’s spending rose 11% to $1.6 billion; Time Warner was up 5.8% to $1.3 billion; News Corp. spending dropped 14% to $1,17 billion.

Online TV Viewing Becoming a Must-Have for TV Networks.

 

The availability of TV programming online has gone from being a nice-to-have to an expect-to-see option in the minds of most Americans, raising major implications for networks and potential new opportunities for advertisers, according to the most recent installment of an ongoing tracking study of the Internet’s effect on TV viewing. Knowledge Networks’ annual “TV Web Connections” report shows that over the past four years Americans have shifted from thinking of online viewing as a novelty to an expectation.

It’s a big question for television networks, How do they monetize the digital side without cannibalizing the mother ship? The good news is that TV programmers seem to have strong demand from advertisers for their digital ad inventory — and so far, reasonable acceptance from users to view it — but the amount of ad inventory online is still a fraction of what they get with conventional television.

In the short term, television programmers can look at online access as an opportunity to expose viewers to shows they might not have otherwise seen, so there is a promotional value. Data from KN and Nielsen show that the growth in online viewing of TV programs has not hurt conventional TV viewing levels. Nielsen, recently began integrating online viewing of TV shows into its core TV ratings services, as it expects the behavior to become an increasingly important factor in total TV viewing levels.

One thing that does not yet appear to be occurring due to the availability of online access to TV shows is so-called “cord-cutting,” or people cutting their conventional TV subscription services, because they can access some or all of the same content online.
Both smartphones and tablet computers — increasingly are becoming a factor for viewing TV programs online, but the No. 1 source still is an Internet-connected personal computer.

The biggest developing factor is the shift in consumers expectations surrounding social sharing. Apps that enable consumers to share TV shows they are watching with friends have become a significant factor — and consumers increasingly expect those features too.

Paid Streaming Services Ready for Prime Time

According to a new Nielsen report, about one-third of U.S. consumers streamed long-form video content, such as a TV show or a movie, from the web through a paid subscription service, at the end of 2011. Nielsen also dove into researching who is watching content through the two dominant web streaming subscription services, Hulu Plus and Netflix. In terms of age, 31% of Hulu users are between the ages of 18 and 34 and more than a third are over the age of 50; 40% of Netflix users are in the 18 to 34 age demographic with only 17% over 50. In terms of, 57% of Netflix’s audience and 59% of Hulu’s audience is female. Women also account for 64% of total time spent watching content on Hulu and Netflix. Nielsen tags the gender data as something of interest; in its recent Cross-Platform Report, Nielsen had found that women stream less online video overall than men. And in terms of race, three-fourths of both the Hulu and Netflix audience is white, while more Hispanics are using Netflix (16%) than Hulu (11%).