VivaKi study determines the best Tablet ad formats

The three best ad models for tablets are: banner to full-page rich media, pre-roll with overlay, and rich media interstitial.

This is according to The Pool, a 14-month long research initiative from VivaKi that featured participation from 26 major advertisers and publishers, including Bank of America, Coca-Cola, GM, ABC Television, Crackle, Scripps, Tremor, and Yahoo.

The study uncovered that the three aforementioned ad models “significantly outperformed” their respective benchmarks on at least one of three behavioral metrics (engagement rate, click-through rate, or time spent), and those who engaged with the models saw lifts on all six attitudinal metrics (unaided awareness, aided awareness, mobile ad awareness, message association, brand favorability, and purchase intent).

For example, pre-rolls with an overlay, which the study determined worked best with video content (obviously), generated a 3.3% increase in time spent when compared to a traditional pre-roll video.

Vivaldi study identifies the best Tablet ad formats

The three best ad models for tablets are: banner to full-page rich media, pre-roll with overlay, and rich media interstitial.

This is according to The Pool, a 14-month long research initiative from VivaKi that featured participation from 26 major advertisers and publishers, including Bank of America, Coca-Cola, GM, ABC Television, Crackle, Scripps, Tremor, and Yahoo.

The study uncovered that the three aforementioned ad models “significantly outperformed” their respective benchmarks on at least one of three behavioral metrics (engagement rate, click-through rate, or time spent), and those who engaged with the models saw lifts on all six attitudinal metrics (unaided awareness, aided awareness, mobile ad awareness, message association, brand favorability, and purchase intent).

For example, pre-rolls with an overlay, which the study determined worked best with video content (obviously), generated a 3.3% increase in time spent when compared to a traditional pre-roll video.

comScore Unveils Multi-Platform Ratings

ComScore on Monday officially launched its new cross-platform reporting system combining audience metrics from Web sites, video and apps across PCs, smartphones and tablets.

Unveiled in beta in November, the company’s Media Metrix Multi-Platform reporting aims to provide a more complete view of an online property’s audience as people increasingly access the Web and other content on mobile devices.

The impact of the mobile shift has been especially pronounced for a handful of top 100 sites, especially where combined desktop and mobile U.S. audience in February increased by triple digits, according to the new comScore numbers. That includes mobile-centric properties like Groupon, up 223%, Zynga (211%) and Pandora (183%).

Across the top 100, the unduplicated audience grew by an average of 38%, with 19 properties seeing the reach of their desktop audience expanded by 50% on smartphones and tablets. (comScore mobile figures reflect use on the iOS and Android platforms.)

Among sites in the top 25 that saw a healthy ratings bump from the combined desktop/mobile reporting were Apple and Twitter, both up 54%, Yelp (51%), the Weather Channel (37%), eBay and About.com (both 29%), Gannett sites (32%), and Amazon (27%).

With the exception of properties like Pandora, the ranking of the top sites remained similar to that when counting desktop-only traffic. The top five multiplatform sites in February — Google, Yahoo, Microsoft, Facebook, and Amazon — were the same ones as through the standard Media Metrix ratings in January.

comScore said the cross-platform reporting will give publishers and media companies better insight into the nature of their audiences in order to align content and marketing strategies and monetization efforts. For media planners, it can help to optimize audience reach and frequency within and across channels.

Public companies like Pandora, Zynga, Yelp and Facebook have already begun highlighting mobile audience metrics in quarterly reports in relation to steps they are taking to monetize the sharp rise in mobile usage. Pandora, for example, reported earlier this month that mobile revenue in its fiscal fourth quarter surged 111% — even faster than the 70% increase in mobile listening hours.

For now, comScore will continue to publicly release the desktop-only Media Metrix top 50 Web properties on a monthly basis, but will regularly publish the Multi-Platform ratings in some capacity alongside, according to Andrew Lipsman, vice president, industry analysis at the digital measurement firm. He added that other services, like the Video Metrix and Mobile Metrix ratings, will be maintained.

The new cross-platform tracking service overall includes reporting on more than 300,000 digital media entities, including their unduplicated audience size, demographic makeup, engagement, performance within key user segments, and behavioral trends.

Cable well positioned for TV Ad Market

Broadcast-television ratings have dropped sharply this season. That, combined with the weak economy and competition from digital media, indicate a bad season for the spring TV ad-sales market, ad buyers and analysts say.

Some of them are predicting that the broadcast networks’ take will be steady to slightly lower in this years upfront,  in which TV executives pitch their new shows for the coming season.

More TV ad dollars are expected to move to cable channels, a shift that has accelerated in the past couple of years. But both broadcast and cable television are facing more intense competition from online media, including Web video outlets.

The ratings declines have some marketers rethinking their ad-buying strategies, ad buyers said. Some are expected to shift money to cable channels, they said. While ratings have declined at some cable channels, ad prices on cable tend to be lower than on broadcast TV, according to ad buyers.

In some cases, the Web could take a share of those dollars. “Advertisers have seen a significant shortage of ratings, and some are willing to take some money and move it online,” said John Muszynski, chief investment officer at ad company Publicis Groupe

Publicis’s ZenithOptimedia expects TV advertising to grow just 2.8% this year to $63.9 billion. Zenith expects outlays on network-TV ads to decline 2% and spending on cable to increase 7%

Full Story at WSJ.com

HBO considers unbundling HBO GO

HBO could widen access to its HBO GO online streaming service by teaming up with broadband Internet providers for customers who do not subscribe to a cable TV service, HBO Chief Executive Richard Plepler said.

Plepler told Reuters on Wednesday evening at the Season 3 premiere of HBO’s hit TV show “Game of Thrones.” “Maybe HBO GO, with our broadband partners, could evolve.”

HBO launched HBO GO in 2010 to let subscribers view its shows over the Internet on devices such as Apple Inc’s iPads. The service has about 6.5 million registered users, compared with more than 100 million for HBO’s main service globally.

However, HBO GO is only accessible to viewers who pay for cable TV service, plus an extra fee for HBO. This means monthly bills of $100 or more typically for people who want to use HBO GO.

Plepler said late Wednesday that HBO GO could also be packaged with a monthly Internet service, in partnership with broadband providers, reducing the cost.

Customers could pay $50 a month for their broadband Internet and an extra $10 or $15 for HBO to be packaged in with that service, for a total of $60 or $65 per month, Plepler said.

“We would have to make the math work,” he added.

HBO, owned by Time Warner Inc, relies on large financial support from its cable and satellite TV partners to help distribute and promote its shows.

Plepler said in January that it would not make business sense to provide an Internet-only product that circumvents its existing distribution network.

Internet-only rivals such as Netflix Inc and Amazon.com Inc are challenging this approach by delivering original programming directly over the Internet.

BTIG analyst Richard Greenfield said that for now, it is not within HBO’s economic interest to offer a broadband-only product, since it endangers HBO’s business model.

“The current model is good to them. If it starts to break down, I’m sure HBO will evolve,” Greenfield said.

He added that HBO GO gives the network an edge against other cable networks if since it is “increasingly on everybody’s smart phone, tablet and desktop.”

GAME OF PIRACY

Game of Thrones has been pirated heavily online, a trend that some industry experts blame on HBO’s tight control of how and when the show can be viewed and the cost of such access.

Most of the piracy occurs outside the United States and HBO is trying to control it, Plepler said.

George R.R. Martin, author of the books upon which the TV show is based, said most of the piracy happens in Australia where viewers have had to wait about six months to see the show.

If Australian viewers got access to Game of Thrones at the same time as in the United States, that would reduce piracy, Martin added.

An HBO spokesman said that 176 markets will air season three of the shows within a week of the United States premiere.

John Bradley-West, one of the actors on the show, said piracy may be reduced if HBO offered a full season pass via Apple’s iTunes store for viewers to stream online a day after the official TV broadcast.

HBO is not changing its Game of Thrones distribution windows for DVDs and electronic sell-through, or EST, the HBO spokesman said. EST is a way of distributing video over the Internet that allows viewers to download movies and TV shows.

In the past, Game of Thrones has been available on iTunes and DVD several months after its initial release.

Smart devices dominate PCs in the home

There are now more than half-a-billion devices in US homes that are connected to the web and offer access to apps, according to The NPD Group.

Overall, NPD’s report says the number of connected devices per “US internet household” has grown from 5.3 devices three months ago to 5.7 devices today.

This growth was fueled by increases in the installed base of tablets (nearly 18 million) and smartphones (nearly 9 million).

This doesn’t mean it’s time to close the coffin on the PC, though, as John Buffone, Director/Devices at NPD Connected Intelligence, says PCs are still the most prevalent connected device in US internet households.

“However, when you look at the combined number of smartphones and tablets consumers own, for the first time ever it exceeded the installed base of computers.”

Affluent Consumers take the lead in Social TV

A new study shows that affluent members of society are leading the charge in media multitasking, particularly when it comes to watching TV and using their tablets or smartphones.

The 2013 Mendelsohn Affluent Barometer from market research specialists Ipsos MediaCT reports that 58 percent of affluent smartphone owners regularly or almost constantly use their smartphones while watching television. An almost equal number of tablet users, 53 percent, admitted the same.

The study included 1,055 adults aged 18 or older who earn more than $100,000 a year. Within that group were 192 “ultra affluent”, those who earn more than $250,000 a year.

The barometer shows that affluent households are more optimistic about the economy, more excited about their future success and more confident about the state of the economy compared to only a couple months ago. They are also adept at integrating mobile technology into their lifestyles.

Media multitasking has moved from the workplace to the home, with more than half of respondents admitting that they have engaged with social media about a television program while watching that program. The study confirms the growing force of social TV, at least among the well-to-do.

Television is becoming a mobile activity, with posts and tweets focusing on everything from game scores to comments on the latest show. This means there is an opportunity for media producers and advertisers to connect with mobile users by providing additional content. Certain shows and networks have already taken advantage of the trend by incorporating real-time contests or providing exclusive content through mobile devices.

Affluent technology users are more lost without their smartphones than without their tablets, with 66 percent responding that it would be very difficult for them to live without their phones, but only 33 percent saying the same thing about their tablet.

Americans streaming more content from game consoles

Americans are increasingly spending more time streaming video on gaming consoles. According to Nielsen data, 22% of American users’ overall time spent on gaming consoles in 2012 was devoted to watching video via VOD and streaming services.

This is up from 19% in 2011 and 13% in 2010. When broken down by the major consoles, PS3 users spent 24% of their console time in 2012 streaming content (up from 15% in 2011, representing the highest year-over-year growth among the three major consoles).

In comparison, Xbox 360 users spent roughly 13% and Wii owners devoted 32% of their time streaming content, respectively. Nielsen’s report covers US console users ages 13 and above.

Cord Cutters grow to 5 Million

Zero TV homes now account for 5% of all TV homes — around 5 million in 2013. Nielsen says these homes have more than doubled from the 2 million in 2007.

Up to 75% of these homes still have TV sets that no longer receive TV programming via traditional means. Sixty-seven percent of Zero TV homes get their content on other devices such as a computer, smartphone or tablet — 37% on computer; 16% on TV Internet; 8% on smartphones, and 6% on tablets.

These homes tend to be young, with more than half under 35 versus the 32% of these young viewers that Nielsen considers TV homes. Some 25% of Zero TV homes are between 25 and 34. More than 85% are “Non Hispanic” versus the 88% “Non Hispanic” traditional TV homes. Over 80% of Zero TVers have no kids in the home, and 60% do not live alone.

Why have these homes unplugged from traditional TV? Nielsen says 36% have done this because of cost, and 31% because of lack of interest. Only 18% consider signing up with a TV subscription service.

Multi-Screen consumption making TV harder to measure

 Every Tuesday, the Nielsen company publishes a popularity ranking of broadcast television programs that has served as the industry’s report card dating back to when most people had only three networks to choose from.

And every week, that list gets less and less meaningful.

With DVRs, video on demand, game consoles and streaming services, tablets and smartphones, the way people watch televisionis changing and the industry is struggling to keep on top of it all. Even the idea of “watching television” is in flux. Are you “watching TV” when you stream an episode of “Downton Abbey” on a tablet?

Nielsen, which has long had a virtual monopoly on the audience statistics that drive a multi-billion dollar industry, last week took an important step toward accounting for some of the changes. Starting in September, Nielsen will begin measuring viewership through broadband devices like game consoles for the first time. Right now those numbers go uncounted.

“The ratings are a very one-dimensional look at what is happening,” said Alan Wurtzel, top research executive at NBC Universal, “and we now live in a very multi-dimensional world.”

Nielsen’s weekly rankings count people who watch a broadcast TV show live or on their DVRs that same day through midnight on the West Coast. To be sure, this is still how most people watch television. CBS didn’t need anything other than live numbers to know that its new reality show “The Job” was a flop, and canceled it a week ago after two episodes.

Through separate, less publicized rankings, Nielsen can also track how many people see a program on a time-shifted basis. One ranking, which measures live viewership plus those who watch on DVR or video on demand within three days of the original airing, is what the industry uses to set advertising rates. Other rankings measure those who watch within a week, or even within a month.

Those numbers can present a much different picture of a program’s popularity.

During the last week of January, for example, ABC’s “Modern Family” ranked No. 12 for the week with 10.8 million viewers if you count just the people who watched on Wednesday, Jan. 23. But within seven days, 15.9 million people had seen the episode, enough to make it the third most popular show of the week behind two “American Idol” episodes. Fox’s “The Following” finished a modest 15th place initially, but its audience jumped by 45 percent over the next week, enough to lift the show to fourth place.

Meanwhile, almost all of the “60 Minutes” viewing is done live. The CBS newsmagazine dropped from seventh place in the initial rankings to 15th after a week.

The time-shifted viewing can change a network’s perception of a show. NBC would have likely canceled “The Office” years ago without this additional audience. “The idea of how many people are watching a program and caring about the show becomes increasingly important, and it is not reflected in the Tuesday report,” Wurtzel said.

In a world where people demand information faster and faster, television executives are no different. They want ratings NOW. The problem is, all of the changes in content consumption demand patience. Nielsen’s report on how many people watch a show within seven days isn’t released until three weeks after a show first airs.

“We have to basically train the entire industry to no longer look at the fastest information, which is preliminary and not necessarily reflective of what the reality is,” Poltrack said.

Nielsen says it regularly discusses how it releases ratings with all of its clients and there’s been no consensus on change. Most people watch their favorite shows as quickly as they can, said Pat McDonough, Nielsen senior vice president of insights and analysis.

Each week the average American spends 32 hours and 15 minutes watching live television, according to a Nielsen study issued last month. More than 12 hours is spent either watching time-shifted TV or DVDs, playing on game consoles, surfing the Internet or watching video on computer or mobile devices, the study said.

“The one thing most people don’t think about is a lot of the additional viewing is rolling out slowly over time and right now, live plus same day viewing is the best way to measure,” she said. “It may not be that way five years from now.”

Networks dispute the notion that things are changing slowly, although they are happy that Nielsen will soon be able to estimate how much television is being watched on broadband. There’s a limit to the information, though: Nielsen can’t yet tell specifically what programs people are watching this way.

Later this year, Nielsen hopes to roll out a pilot program to identify what people are watching on iPads. It’s unclear when this technology will be available for other tablet brands or for smartphones.

The company measures some online video streaming and includes it within its time-shifted reports. However, this picture is partial, too. Nielsen can measure streamed programs only if they have the same commercials shown on TV, and not every website does this.

Netflix’s release of an entire 13-episode season of the well-reviewed series “House of Cards” on Feb. 1 was a television landmark, evidence that a lot more “television” content is coming from non-traditional sources. Nielsen has no idea how many people have seen “House of Cards,” though. Netflix knows. But it won’t tell.

People are increasingly spending time catching up on series they’ve caught on to midstream, the phenomenon known as binge viewing. No one really knows who is spending an evening watching three episodes from the first season of “Homeland” instead of live TV. Nielsen has an oblique way to illustrate that binge viewing is a reality: When AMC’s “The Walking Dead” returned from a hiatus on Feb. 10, the 12.3 million people who watched that night was a series record and evidence that it had attracted new fans during a pause in original episodes.

That episode of “The Walking Dead” was the ninth most-watched television show in prime time that week, but it would have taken some investigation to know that. Nielsen ranks broadcast and cable shows separately even though that distinction means little to a younger generation of viewers. TV is TV.

There’s a similar dynamic with PBS. The public broadcasting system generally doesn’t pay Nielsen to have its programs rated, although it will on special occasions. The 8.2 million people who watched the third-season finale of “Downton Abbey” on Feb. 17 was more than anything seen on ABC, Fox or NBC that night. No one would have known that unless they’d seen a report generated by a PBS press release.

The numbers-crunchers within the industry know all of this.

Nielsen’s Tuesday rankings — and the achievement of getting into the week’s Top Ten — used to mean the world. Now it’s a small part of television’s picture.

DAVID BAUDER